Usability For Older Web Users

According to the 2001 UK census ( the UK now hasaversion to downloading documents from the
more people aged over 60 than under 16. It alsointernet because they were "worried about bugs [i.e.
revealed that there are now 1.1 million people agedviruses] and things". None of the younger participants
over 85.expressed such views.
Webcredible recently analysed and compared theHigher incidence of 'search' usage
results of 16 usability testing sessions - 8 of theseOf the younger participant group in our study, only 2
sessions were conducted with elderly users (i.e. overindividuals used the available search functionality,
the age of 65), and 8 with younger users (i.e. underwhereas 6 of the elderly participant group chose to
the age of 40).make use of it. It is possible that this may have
The 40-minute 'talk-aloud' sessions involved askingdeveloped as a means of compensating for their
participants to find information on a range ofapparent difficulties/discomfort with traditional
government websites.browsing.
Assigning blameIt should be noted that all users expected a site to
The main finding of our study was that elderly usershave a single 'Search' function that searched all of the
were more likely to assign blame when using thesite's content.
Internet.Slow task-completion and reading
Of the 8 elderly participants, 3 appeared to blameOur elderly participants required over double the
themselves for any difficulties which theyaverage time of our younger participants to
encountered (sample quotes: "I don't really knowcomplete a task.
what I'm doing"; "It's probably my fault"; "This always3 of our elderly participants also displayed a tendency
happens to me"). 4 of the elderly users, however,to read all of the text on a page before being willing
seemed to blame the site(s) for any difficulties whichto decide on their next course of action. None of our
they encountered (sample quotes: "I hate it whenyounger participants did this.
websites do this"; "Well, that's stupid"; "That doesn'tPreference for 'big and simple' design
make any sense").7 of our elderly participants reported anything less
We found that the younger group of users were farthan 12-point type as being too small to read
less likely to assign explicit blame for any difficultiescomfortably - and even though all users agreed that
encountered - with only 1 user from this groupbeing able to re-size the text on the screen would be
assigning blame (to themselves).a good idea, only one of them knew how to do so
Emotional reactionthrough the browser.
We also found that elderly users used far moreIt was also the case that all elderly participants
emotive words and phrases when referring topreferred 800x600 over 1024x768 resolution.
websites than younger users.Our recommendations
All of the elderly users employed strongly positive orAlthough more research into the internet behaviours
negative words in their remarks, such as "love",and preferences of elderly users is obviously required,
"hate", "stupid", "helpful" and "friendly". Indeed, onewe would like to suggest the following:
participant even talked to the website as if it were a- Designers should investigate innovative ways to
pet ("That's a good boy")!communicate the fact that a page is not finished and
In contrast, only 2 of the younger participantsrequires scrolling
expressed themselves in comparably strong terms- Technical terms should be avoided if possible - and
(both when talking negatively about aspects of awhere they have to be used, a clear explanation
site).must be easily accessible (including examples
Weaker mental modelswherever appropriate)
A very interesting finding was that 6 of the elderly- Links should be identified in a consistent and obvious
participants regularly failed to scroll down a page (i.e.way (e.g. blue, bold, underline, red on mouse-over)
did not do so six or more times in a session). This- The attention-grabbing features on a page (e.g.
failure led these participants to often miss informationheadings, pictures, icons, instructions and bullets)
that was directly relevant to their task.should be links
In comparison, none of the younger participants failed- Visited links should change colour
to scroll down a page six or more times in a session.- Provide an HTML-version of as much content as
In our opinion, this is likely to be attributable to elderlypossible and do not require users to install software
users not having fully internalised the concept of(even Adobe Acrobat) in order to be able to access
browser-windows often requiring scrolling - a conceptinformation
novel to computer-technology.- Make content as concise and clear as possible -
Technical languageconsider providing two versions of the same content
We also found that elderly users were less likely to('simple' and 'detailed') and allow users to decide which
understand technical language. For instance, athey want to access
moderator's request to "bring up the minimised- Sites should provide a 'Make the writing bigger' link
window" was not understood by 5 elderly users (inwith accompanying illustrations/icons and always use
comparison to not being understood by only 2 of thehigh contrast to display text e.g. black text on an
younger users).off-white background (N.B. using an off-white
We found that elderly users were at least twice asbackground is preferable to white because it reduces
likely as younger users to not understand thethe chances of eyestrain for people who are slow
following phrases: 'Homepage', 'URL' and 'Browser'.readers)
Link identification- Provide explicit instructions by using the imperative
Our sessions showed that elderly participants were -forms of verbs (e.g. 'Go to more details on...', 'Find a...',
as a group - more likely to click on elements of aetc.)
page which weren't links (an average of 14 times perConclusions
session, in comparison to the younger participants'Elderly users are an audience group that will grow in
average of 5 times per session).size and importance over the next few years. Our
It was also the case that all elderly users reportedstudies indicate that there are lots of simple things
preferring websites that changed the colour of theirwe can do to support their use of the internet.
visited links, whereas only 5 of the youngerWe believe that these recommendations should be
participants considered the matter significant.taken into account by all sites, and efforts should be
Aversion to downloadingmade to further expand our knowledge of how to
Of the 8 elderly participants, 5 expressed a strongdesign for these users.