SEO - Google Devaluing Sitewide Links

I was reading through the blog of Matt Cutts, one ofyou'd better be ready to pay a pretty price for that
the head engineer's at google and a very adamantservice, because they'll actually be sending you some
blogger. He talks a lot about SEO and changes toof their traffic and promoting your product as
Google's algorithms along with the normal personalopposed to just providing a link for SEO.
blog topics like personal info and video games.One interesting thing to note from Matt Cutts. He
I was doing some SEO research for a new client'srementions the rel="no" tag. Again for reference this
website and I was looking into evidence for theis the tag that you can add to your links to have
devaluation of sitewide links. A sitewide link is a linkthem not pass on pagerank. Now youre first question
on every page of a single website. In the pastmay be "why would anyone want to stop a linking
sidewide links were great for SEO, still are, but theyfrom passing pagerank of relevancy".
are becoming less effective on Google. MattThere are a bunch of creative answers for that one,
particularly comments on google's devaulaing ofbut at the basic level this was designed for bloggers
sitewide links in a few posts. From my experience, onwho could reduce the power of links contained within
older sites if you have a large amount of other links,blog comments in order to discourage comment
and you get say a link on 50% of pages on anotherspammers. Matt cutts recommends adding rel="no"
websites Google will count them all as links and thisto any links you sell. Now if I was going to sell a link
will be a bit more valuable then say a single link, butto a poker site or a bad neighborhood. This might be
for a new website, avoid sitewide links on Google. Ifa good idea as to not hurt my relevancy in google,
you go from having a few links to having a bunch ofbut if a website had a similar topic, and was very
links all from one website it's appears that Google willlegitmate, I'll get a lot more money and they'll get a
completely devalue those links because they appearlot more benefit from a regular intact link, and if I
to have been paid for and one of Google's currenthide it correctly, google will never be able to tell It
crusades is to cut down the power of paid links.was paid for it. Especially if for an additional fee
Currently buying and selling links on the "blackorcourse, I added a page to my blog or to my site
market" is one of the major and very importantdescribing wha the other website was and why I
tactics of modern SEO. You build a good site,was linking to them, but that's all hypothetical.
optimize for the search engines, be creative, try toRight now adsense is my only way to monetize this
get as many links as possible and then buy the restwebsite and it isn't paying too well, but then again I
to give you that "push" above the competition.just launched this redesign and with some hard work
Although Matt talks about how they won't help you,I should be able to dramatically incrase my traffic
I believe a lot of this is wishful thinking, or alevels, hopefully enough to earn a nice monthly check
prediction of the near future. Currently as long as thefrom Google.
advertiser doesn't label your link with a title linkSummary of two different SEO issues mentioned
"advertisement, sponsor, link partner" etc, the link willhere:
still count, especially if they include it in the body of1. Google devaluing site wide links (links from the
their content with normal anchor text. Of coursesame domain or website) 2.